If only there was some kind of strike going on right now related which also included taking issues with residual payments. But that also means shows that are amazingly unpopular have a huge anchor around their neck, basically serving as an annual reminder to these companies they're still paying to host them. That means super popular shows don't cost them more to host, until contract re-negotiation time for season 2. But all the streaming contracts are based on a number regardless of show popularity.
Subsequent years have a diminishing amount.
Late applicants who are accepted will pay the tuition fees in a shorter. Whether the show gets a billion views, or 17 views, it's the same payment each year. There are a range of loans available, including the Prodigy Loan programme. In the streaming world, it's a fixed amount of royalty payments. It's really a 'savings on annual royalties.' So they can lower the projected amount they have to pay in royalties in the coming fiscal year.īut, of course, the next step in your though process is: "But if it's about royalties, why are they removing the unpopular shows? Royalties are based on how many times it's shown on TV, right?" It's not actually a tax write-off, per se.
0 kommentar(er)
